Puro International of New Jersey Corp. v. California Union Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a judgment imposing liability on the corporate parent—who was a party to the case—because the facts supported piercing the corporate veil under the instrumentality rule
• discussing elements and factors that courts consider when piercing the corporate veil
• discussing elements and factors that courts consider when piercing the corporate veil
• plaintiff awarded $1 in nominal damages, and thus $3 in treble damages for unfair practices violation
• “[T]he issues of fraud and punitive damages are separate and distinct claims from the issue of unfair and deceptive trade practices.”
• corporate veil piercing applicable to LLCs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).