Skip to main content
· 1/15/1834

Purnell v. Hogan

Citations

  • 5 Stew. & P. 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deferring to the government’s declaration on the ground that “the Army’s posture is not unreasonable”
  • finding that “only ... extremely limited circumstances” warrant enjoining performance
  • upholding decision not to disqualify a bid after allegations that the company took proprietary information from a competitor and used it for an advantage in the proposal
  • “In general, although largely a fact and case-specific inquiry, information loses its confidential nature once it becomes stale.”
  • “[A] protestor’s mere disagreement with the agency’s evaluation determination does not provide a basis for sustaining the protest.”
  • “In general, although largely a fact and case-specific inquiry, information loses its confidential nature once it becomes stale.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saffold, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.