Purk v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[m]ere confirmation of innocent static details in an anonymous tip does not constitute corroboration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Crews
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-09-10· cited 95×
• United States v. Alfred Lenoci, Sr.
  Second Circuit· 2004-07-28· cited 26×
• United States v. Guitterez
  N.D. California· 1998-01-23· cited 2×
• United States v. Capozzi
  D. Massachusetts· 1999-10-22· cited 2×
• United States v. Charles Edward Bane
  Fourth Circuit· 1995-12-07· cited 1×
• Kendrick v. Baca
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-14· cited 1×
• United States v. Miles G. Ramsey, United States of America v. Miles G. Ramsey
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-04-24

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Purk v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1994-02-16· cited 2×

Other cases named Purk v. United States

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Purk v. United States
  S.D. Ohio· 1989-04-12· cited 8×
• Purk v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1994-02-16· cited 2×
• Purk v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-10-23· cited 1×
• Purk v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-02-06
• Purk v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1990-10-01
• Purk v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1990-10-01
• Purk v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-01-17
• Purk v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-01-17