Skip to main content
· 12/7/1981

Purex Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co. And Clorox Co.

Citations

  • 664 F.2d 1105
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • this court held that even if an acquisition had anticompetitive consequences, the plaintiff could not recover unless it established that it suffered injury from the anticompetitive effects of the acquisitions
  • this court held that even if an acquisition had anticompeti-tive consequences, the plaintiff could not recover unless it established that it suffered injury from the anticompetitive effects of the acquisitions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Fletcher, Solomon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.