· 1/15/1857
Purefoy v. Hill & Co.
Citations
- 18 Ark. 361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the Agreement is at most tangential to government procurement of goods or services, it is not covered by the CDA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hanly, Hon, Stith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.