Pure Proceeds, LLC v. RJS Consultants, Inc., etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that erroneous sentencing enhancement for restraint of victim was “ordinary misapplication of the [Guidelines] that does not amount to a miscarriage of justice”
• holding that erroneous sentencing enhancement for restraint of victim was “ordinary misapplication of the [Guidelines] that does not amount to a miscarriage of justice”
• holding that actual innocence of noncapital sentence is limited to eligibility for sentencing as a career or habitual offender
• finding that alleged error in enhancing defendants’ “offense levels for restraint of the victim is merely an allegation of an ordinary misapplication of the guidelines that does not amount to a miscarriage of justice”
• limiting a petitioner's argument of actual innocence of a sentence to \eligibility for application of career offender guideline provision\
• holding misapplication of the Guidelines does not constitute a miscarriage of justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).