Skip to main content
· 4/9/2002

Pure Distributors, Inc. v. Baker

Citations

  • 285 F.3d 150
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6503
  • 2002 WL 506838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In order for the plaintiff to have a cause of action for tortious interference of contract, it is axiomatic that there must be a breach of that contract”
  • “The remaining claims in that action are awaiting trial, and the district judge, in dismissing Pure’s claims, did not enter judgment in favor of Eicotech in accordance with Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.