Skip to main content

Purdy v. State

Citations

  • 43 Fla. 538

Syllabus

<p>1. Objections to the admissibility of evidence must, as a general rule, be made when ft is offered, or its admissibility can not be assigned as error.</p> <p>2. - In a criminal prosecution witnesses introduced on behalf of the State objected to answering certain questions propounded to them by the State on the ground that their answers would criminate them, but were required by the court to answer Hhd questions. The defendants at the same time made no objection to the testimony and took no exceptions to the ruling of the court. Held, that the objection on part of defendants to the evidence for the first time in a motion for a new trial came too late to save the point.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.