Purdum v. Sherman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• possession was notorious when adverse holder’s cattle grazed disputed land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Poullos v. Pine Crest Homes
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-03-25· cited 160×
• Wanha v. Long
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-12-31· cited 68×
• Svoboda v. Johnson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1979-07-17· cited 46×
• Wiedeman v. JAMES E. SIMON CO., INC
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-06-19· cited 40×
• Barnes v. Milligan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1976-04-28· cited 28×
• Ziemba v. Zeller
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1957-11-15· cited 21×
• Weiss v. Meyer
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-03-27· cited 20×
• Worm v. Crowell
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1958-01-03· cited 20×
• Brown v. Jacobsen Land and Cattle Co.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2019-03-15· cited 18×
• James v. McNair
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1957-03-08· cited 15×
• Nennemann v. Rebuck
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-03-05· cited 14×
• Sturm v. Mau
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-11-06· cited 13×
• Barnes v. Milligan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1978-03-29· cited 13×
• Thomas v. Flynn
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1959-12-18· cited 12×
• McDermott v. Boman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1957-11-15· cited 11×
• Converse v. Kenyon
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1965-01-08· cited 11×
• Dartmouth College v. Rose
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1961-12-01· cited 9×
• Simacek v. York County Rural Public Power District
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-07-19· cited 9×
• Krumwiede v. Rose
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1964-07-10· cited 8×
• Konop v. Knobel
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1958-11-07· cited 7×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jurgensen v. Ainscow
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1952-05-09· cited 22×
• Hallowell v. Borchers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1948-11-05· cited 16×
• Tex v. Pflug
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1888-07-15· cited 9×