Pulver v. Avco Financial Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff sufficiently pleaded special damages by alleging financial harm in the form of lost earnings and damage to her credit
• creditor’s reporting of false debt to consumer reporting agencies was not subject to qualified immunity under § 1681h(e) of the FCRA
• creditor's reporting of false debt to consumer reporting agencies was not subject to qualified immunity under § 1681h(e) of the FCRA
• “In other words, the plaintiff is the person to whom the misrepresentation must have been made, and it is the plaintiff who must have relied on the misrepresentation to his damage.”
• defamation claim stated where the defendant allegedly reported to a third party that the plaintiff was responsible for a debt that did not in fact belong to her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).