Pulte Home Corp. v. Parex, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “We decline to comb through the eight-volume, 3,876-page record extract to ascertain information that Parex should have provided[.]”
• pointing to the property’s character as an “integrated whole” or part of the finished product when considering whether Maryland’s “other property” exception applied
• “We decline to comb through the eight-volume, 3,876-page record extract to ascertain information that Parex should have provided[.]”
• “[S]ubrogation is not a cause of action in and of itself. Rather, the doctrine of subrogation allows a party to step into the shoes of another in order to pursue a cause of action.”
• “We decline to comb through the eight-volume, 3,876-page record extract to ascertain information that ... should have [been] provided—a clear reference to a page or pages of the record extract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).