Pullum v. Condermann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Pennsylvania law is well-settled that matters not of record cannot be considered on appeal
• holding that while Rule 600 was designed to implement the speedy trial rights provided by the federal and state constitutions, the constitutional provisions themselves provide a separate and broader basis for asserting aclaim of undue delay
• confirming that trial courts are not required to rearrange their schedules to accommodate deadlines imposed by Pennsylvania’s speedy trial procedural rules
• stating that “if a document is not in a certified record, the Superior Court may not consider it.”
• noting that it is the appellant’s responsibility to ensure the transmission of a complete record to allow this court an opportunity for meaningful review
• explaining that the ultimate responsibility of ensuring that the transmitted record is complete rests squarely upon the appellant and not upon the appellate courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).