Pullman Power Products, Inc. v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attributing subsidiary's activity to parent for purposes of Clayton Act 7
• defendant can rebut prima facie case “by a demonstration that the merger will not have anticompetitive effects”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).