· 1/17/1921
Pullman Co. v. State Industrial Commission
Citations
- 254 U.S. 666
- 41 S. Ct. 217
- 65 L. Ed. 465
- 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1881
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that whether a parent receives an improvement period is subject to the children’s best interests, which is the paramount concern in an abuse and neglect proceeding
- explaining that a parent is not “unconditionally entitled to an improvement period”
- “Both statutory and case law emphasize that a parent charged with abuse and/or neglect is not unconditionally entitled to an improvement period.”
- “[E]ntitlement to an improvement period is conditioned upon the ability of the [parent] to demonstrate ‘by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is likely to fully participate in the improvement period.’”
- “[R]ather than presuming the entitlement of a parent to an improvement period . . . the law now places on the parent the burden of proof regarding whether an improvement period is appropriate.”
- a parent’s “entitlement to an improvement period is conditioned upon the ability of the [parent] to demonstrate ‘by clear and convincing evidence that the [parent] is likely to fully participate in the improvement period’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.