Skip to main content
· 1/17/1921

Pullman Co. v. State Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 254 U.S. 666
  • 41 S. Ct. 217
  • 65 L. Ed. 465
  • 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that whether a parent receives an improvement period is subject to the children’s best interests, which is the paramount concern in an abuse and neglect proceeding
  • explaining that a parent is not “unconditionally entitled to an improvement period”
  • “Both statutory and case law emphasize that a parent charged with abuse and/or neglect is not unconditionally entitled to an improvement period.”
  • “[E]ntitlement to an improvement period is conditioned upon the ability of the [parent] to demonstrate ‘by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent is likely to fully participate in the improvement period.’”
  • “[R]ather than presuming the entitlement of a parent to an improvement period . . . the law now places on the parent the burden of proof regarding whether an improvement period is appropriate.”
  • a parent’s “entitlement to an improvement period is conditioned upon the ability of the [parent] to demonstrate ‘by clear and convincing evidence that the [parent] is likely to fully participate in the improvement period’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.