· 3/13/1912
Pullman Co. v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad
Citations
- 147 Ky. 498
- 144 S.W. 385
- 1912 Ky. LEXIS 280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to dismiss FDUTPA claim against vehicle manufacturer defendant on primary jurisdiction grounds after noting \heavy presumption against invoking primary jurisdiction\
- considering the “Warranty Guide” because it is central to the plaintiff’s breach of express warranty claim
- recognizing third-party beneficiary exception under Florida law
- recognizing third-party beneficiary exception under Florida law
- “Plaintiff can pursue a claim of breach of implied warranty through third-party beneficiary law.’’
- acknowledging the third-party beneficiary exception under Florida law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chiep, Hobson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.