Pullin v. City of Kimberly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the denial of a motion for relief from a summary judgment
• “[I]t is well settled that 60(b)(1) and 60(b)(6) are mutually exclusive provisions, such that a ground for relief asserted, falling fairly under 60(b)(1), cannot be granted under 60(b)(6).”
• held that the district court correctly granted summary judgment and did not consider other theories upon which the Pullins could have based their claim of ownership, when the allegations in the complaint only made a general allegation of ownership
• held that the district court correctly granted summary judgment and did not consider other theories upon which the Pullins could have based their claim of ownership, when the allegations in the complaint only made a general allegation of ownership
• “[I]t is well settled in Idaho that an abutting landowner’s use or possession of an unused portion of a highway is not adverse to the public and cannot ripen into a right or title no matter how long continued.”
• \[I]t is well settled in Idaho that an abutting landowner's use or possession of an unused portion of a highway is not adverse to the public and cannot ripen into a right or title no matter how long continued.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).