Skip to main content
· 7/9/1991

Pulliam v. Sullivan

Citations

  • 769 F. Supp. 1471
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9464
  • 1991 WL 138823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “By virtue of the non-overlapping time periods covered by the two applications at issue here, [plaintiff’s] two claims for benefits are entirely different.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.