Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 7/17/1990
Pulliam v. Pulliam
Citations
- 796 P.2d 623
- 61 O.B.A.J. 1953
- 1990 OK 71
- 1990 Okla. LEXIS 75
- 1990 WL 98191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the present value method is preferable where pension valuation is not unduly speculative, but allowing the trial court discretion in determining which method to use
- comparing the immediate offset/present-cash-value method with the deferred-distribution method
- present value method or deferred distribution method
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Opala
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re the Marriage of HuntSupreme Court of Colorado· 1995-12-18· cited 325×
- Gamble v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-06-02· cited 142×
- In Re the Marriage of NordahlColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-06-04· cited 32×
- Wilkinson v. WilkinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2004-04-16· cited 20×
- Tubbs v. State, ex rel. Teachers' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2002-10-15· cited 19×
- Risoldi v. RisoldiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-05-03· cited 15×
- Brattmiller v. BrattmillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2007-06-01· cited 14×
- Brazil v. BrazilCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-10-12· cited 11×
- Smith v. HenleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-12-15· cited 3×
- In Re the Marriage of Joseph Vincent Colarusso and Karyl Jean Colarusso Upon the Petition of Joseph Vincent Colarusso, and Concerning Karyl Jean Colarusso, N/K/A Karyl Jean HughesCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-12-09
- Opinion No. (1996)Oklahoma Attorney General Reports· 1996-05-09
- Opinion No. (1996)Oklahoma Attorney General Reports· 1996-12-31
- Opinion No. (1996)Oklahoma Attorney General Reports· 1996-03-28
- FITZPATRICK v. FITZPATRICKSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2023-06-20
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-05-19· cited 228×
- Cross v. CrossWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 106×
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1983-01-21· cited 92×
- DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-10· cited 81×
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-08-21· cited 77×
- Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court· 1987-05-12· cited 61×
- Copeland v. CopelandNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 51×
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-02-15· cited 44×
- Hodgins v. HodginsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-07-01· cited 41×
- Dewan v. DewanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-04-23· cited 34×
- Hatcher v. HatcherMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-10-24· cited 33×
- Marriage of Kis v. KisMontana Supreme Court· 1982-01-21· cited 29×
- Dewan v. DewanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1983-11-16· cited 27×
- Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1987-06-30· cited 26×
- Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1986-06-26· cited 25×
- Cole v. ColeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1989-07-13· cited 21×
- In Re Marriage of HobbsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-11-18· cited 17×
- Bailey v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-11-13· cited 16×
- Matter of Marriage of MinnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-10-05· cited 13×
- Marriage of Fastner v. FastnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-07-26· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.