PULLAM v. Employment Dept.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Our role is to determine whether that record, viewed as a whole, is capa- ble of being read as the agency read it.” (Emphasis in origi- nal.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kay v. Employment Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-01· cited 6×
• Barrera v. Employment Dept.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-07-10

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cummings v. Employment Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-04-28· cited 2×
• Pullam v. Employment Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-20· cited 1×