Pulido v. St. Joseph Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a doctor is not entitled to damages or reinstatement of staff privileges where staff privileges are revoked in violation of hospital bylaws
• admission of testimony that was arguably hearsay at a suspension hearing did not violate an identical bylaw concerning admission of evidence
• a doctor is not entitled to damages or reinstatement of staff privileges where staff privileges are revoked in violation of hospital bylaws
• admission of testimony that was arguably hearsay at a suspension hearing did not violate an identical bylaw concerning admission of evidence
• “[A] doctor claiming that a private hospital violated its bylaws in rendering a decision regarding his staff privileges is only entitled to relief requiring the hospital to comply with those bylaws before it renders its decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).