Skip to main content
· 5/19/1993

Puleo v. Thomas

Citations

  • 624 A.2d 1075
  • 425 Pa. Super. 285
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding where trial court “is deficient in failing to detail factual findings in a manner which will permit meaningful review”, a reviewing court may perform such review
  • failure to raise an issue in post-trial motions or exceptions generally results in waiver of that issue for purposes of appellate review
  • failure to raise an issue in post-trial motions or exceptions generally results in waiver of that issue for purposes of appellate review
  • “[A] failure to raise an issue in post[-]trial motions or exceptions would normally result in a waiver of that issue for purposes of appellate review.”
  • issues not raised before lower court are normally waived for the purpose of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamilia, Hudock, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.