Pulaski v. Riland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a recital stating that the parties “have determined herewith to settle their property rights” was not binding and that “we must look to the operative part of the agreement to find out what the parties actually did”
• court “must look to the operative part of the agreement,” not to the recitals, “to find out what the parties actually did”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).