Skip to main content

Pulaski County v. Jacuzzi Bros. Division

Citations

  • 317 Ark. 10
  • 875 S.W.2d 496
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although the county itself was a proper party to the suit, the official who would be charged with carrying out the order of the court should have been joined as a necessary party to the action
  • holding that, although the county itself was a proper party to the suit, the official who would be charged with carrying out the order of the court should have been joined as a necessary party to the action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Newbern, Vote

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Pulaski County v. Jacuzzi Bros. Division

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.