District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/7/1995
Pula v. State
Citations
- 652 So. 2d 981
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming order denying postconviction motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)
- “The validity of written reasons to support an upward departure from the permissible guidelines sentence is an issue that should and must be raised in the context of the direct appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: W. Sharp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Raley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-10· cited 61×
- Wood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-05· cited 6×
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-17· cited 1×
- Demo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-08· cited 1×
- Scalf v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-07
- Eduardo Acosta v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-11-06
- Pula v. DixonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-11-13
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.