District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/26/1992
Puglia v. Puglia
Citations
- 600 So. 2d 484
- 1992 WL 109133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A trial court has discretion as to the manner in which the arrearage is to be repaid.”
- “A trial court has discretion as to the manner in which the arrearage is to be repaid.”
- “Although the father could have sought modification of the child support order in advance, he did not do so. Having failed to do so, it is too late to seek this remedy retroactively.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Cope and Gersten
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Dept. of Revenue v. SegregaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-18· cited 11×
- Pyne v. BlackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-17· cited 11×
- Kutz v. FankhanelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-23· cited 8×
- Waldman v. WaldmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-26· cited 7×
- Kranz v. KranzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-05· cited 6×
- Vitt v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-15· cited 6×
- Milopoulos v. MilopoulosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-23· cited 5×
- Rodgers v. ReedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-16· cited 4×
- Cortina v. LorieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-24· cited 3×
- Yockey v. YockeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-16· cited 2×
- STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. OrtegaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-31· cited 2×
- State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Pulliam v. WattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-04· cited 2×
- Prio v. BarouhDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-27· cited 2×
- Porro v. PorroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-21· cited 1×
- Scott v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-22
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Whaley v. WhaleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-07
- State ex rel. Cheren v. CherenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-04
- State of Florida, Department of Revenue, Child Support Program v. Jean FucienDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-02-18
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Teta v. TetaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-07-16· cited 52×
- Smithwick v. SmithwickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-03-22· cited 50×
- Roffe v. RoffeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-10-06· cited 26×
- Raybuck v. RaybuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-20· cited 23×
- Ashe v. AsheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-30· cited 20×
- Leone v. WeedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-21· cited 19×
- Martinez v. MartinezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-27· cited 17×
- Onley v. OnleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-14· cited 17×
- Guarino v. GuarinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-13· cited 15×
- Jimenez v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-02-11· cited 15×
- Goff v. GoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-03-26· cited 10×
- Larger v. DiazDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-24· cited 10×
- Parrish v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-02· cited 10×
- Tash v. OesterleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-03-18· cited 9×
- Ragan v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-11-17· cited 8×
- Kolb v. KolbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.