Skip to main content
· 7/31/1987

Pugh v. Butler Telephone Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 512 So. 2d 1317
  • 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that inspections made for the sole benefit of a telephone company to ensure compliance with plans and specifications did not create a duty of care to the employees of a construction company
  • stating that no master-servant relationship exists between an entity and a worker if the entity has not reserved the right to control the means by which the work is performed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Houston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.