Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (In Re Pacific Gas & Electric Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that electricity is a good for the purposes of the UCC
• finding that a letter that “did not include any statement regarding the consequences of a failure to respond” did not qualify as a written demand for assurances under UCC Section 2-609
• “Simply put, electricity in this instance is a thing movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale.”
• electricity is “good” because it can be moved through power lines and identified through meters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).