Puett v. State Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a district court’s finding that defendants do not have standing to challenge an assignment contract they were not parties to
• application of law of the case doctrine appropriate to avoid re-litigating issue resolved in previous stage of same suit
• application of law of the case doctrine appropriate to avoid re-litigating issue resolved in previous stage of same suit
• arbitrator’s decision attached to motion to dismiss was not “matter outside pleadings” and could properly be considered on motion to dismiss
• assignment of arbitration claims for payments due under the completed contract not prohibited by nonassignment provision in the contract
• contract provision that “[t]he parties hereto agree not to assign this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party hereto” did not bar assignment of breach of contract and other damages claims under the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).