Skip to main content

Puente v. State

Citations

  • 320 S.W.3d 352
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1166
  • 2010 WL 3655904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an alteration to a judicial confession, even when it is reduced to writing, is decidedly not a charging instrument, and thus could not constitute amendment of the indictment
  • stating, in a felony case that “[a] written judicial confession provides evidentiary support for a plea of guilty to the charges alleged in the indictment.”
  • “[A] judicial confession of a guilty plea, even when it is reduced to writing, is decidedly not a charging instrument.”
  • State amended indictment to delete under six language to eliminate mandatory minimum punishment of 25 years from subsection (f)
  • State amended indictment to delete under six language to eliminate mandatory minimum punishment of 25 years from subsection (f)
  • although trial court approved parties’ agreement to amend indictment, where no physical changes to indictment were made, and no amended photocopy, just handwritten changes to defendant’s judicial confession, such did not amount to an amendment of indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Womack, Johnson, Holcomb, Cochran, Keasler, Keller, Hervey, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.