Skip to main content
· 12/20/2007

Puello v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services

Citations

  • 511 F.3d 324
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29397
  • 2007 WL 4440916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding 3 that “‘conviction’ refers to the date on which judgment is entered on the docket, 4 not the date on which a court accepts a guilty plea”
  • “[S]tatutory analysis necessarily begins with the plain meaning of a law’s text and, absent ambiguity, will generally end there.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[S]tatutory analysis necessarily begins with the plain meaning of a law’s text and, absent ambiguity, will generally end there.”
  • “‘[A] statute must, if reasonably possible, be construed in a way that will give force and effect to each of its provisions rather than render some of them meaningless.’”
  • “‘[A] statute must, if reasonably possible, be construed in a way that will give force and effect to each of its provisions rather than render some of them meaningless.’”
  • “‘[A] statute must, if reasonably possible, be construed in a way that will give force and effect to each of its provisions rather than render some of them meaningless.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Sack, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.