Skip to main content
· 1/28/2000

Pueblo v. Santiago Soto

Citations

  • 6 T.C.A. 62
  • 2000 DTA 99

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “where the payments are to be made periodically, each successive failure to make proper payment gives rise to a new claim upon which suit can be brought”
  • noting that “out of one set of facts and circumstances involving the claimant’s separation from service there arises but one claim” and “cautioning] against multiplication of monetary claims successively arising out of essentially the same facts”
  • finding widow’s action for disability retirement pay denied to her husband not a continuing claim
  • finding widow’s action for disability retirement pay denied to her husband not a continuing claim
  • limiting back pay claims to those accruing within the statute of limitations period
  • explaining that a claim that a service member has been improperly denied disability retirement “does not accrue on release from active duty but rather on final action of a board competent to pass upon eligibility for disability retirement (or upon refusal of a request for such a board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: García, Ponente, Por, Presidente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.