Pueblo v. Sanjurjo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the All Writs Act empowers this Court to issue a post-conviction writ of coram no-bis
• stating that Article 67, UCMJ, does not describe the full powers of this Court; rather, the Court also possesses incidental powers as part of its responsibility under the UCMJ to protect the constitutional rights of members of the armed forces
• stating that Article 67, UCMJ, does not describe the full powers of this Court; rather, the Court also possesses incidental powers as part of its responsibility under the UCMJ to protect the constitutional rights of members of the armed forces
• “The All Writs Act merely makes ‘explicit the right to exercise powers implied from the creation of such courts.’ ”
• All Writs Act applicable not only to Article III courts, but to all courts established by Congress
• Article 67 does not describe the full powers of this Court; rather, the Court also possesses incidental powers as part of its responsibility under the UCMJ to protect the constitutional rights of members of the armed forces

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).