Pueblo v. Rossy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an act constitutes conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, if it evinces “a wanton disregard for a moral standard generally and properly accepted by society”
• holding Article 134, UCMJ, not intended to set standard for private conduct
• fornication in the absence of aggravating circumstances is not an offense under military law because “Congress has not intended by Article 134 . . . to regulate the wholly private moral conduct of an individual”
• fornication not an offense in “absence of aggravating circumstances”
• pandering exists even if no expectation of financial gain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).