Pueblo v. Rodríguez Hernández

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold, therefore, that inasmuch as the specification failed to state that the regulation allegedly violated was a “general” regulation, it was fatally defective with reference to prosecution under Article 92(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).