Pueblo v. Paredes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• testing for prejudice from improper selection of court members but not clearly allocating the prejudice burden
• testing for prejudice from improper selection of court members but not clearly allocating the prejudice burden
• selection process involving nomination by subordinate commanders based solely on requested ranks and without reference to Article 25 criteria was found improper
• selection process involving nomination by subordinate commanders based solely on requested ranks and without reference to Article 25 criteria was found improper
• exclusion of junior enlisted soldiers from panels in order to achieve heavier sentences
• observing a “fixed policy” to exclude certain members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).