· 8/17/2010
Pueblo v. National Indian Gaming Commission
Citations
- 731 F. Supp. 2d 36
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84522
- 2010 WL 3239114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the same for claims arising under the APA and NEPA
- holding the same for claims arising under the APA and NEPA
- granting motion to transfer given the “strong local implications” in a case involving tribal gaming operations
- granting motion to transfer given the “strong local implications” in a case involving tribal gaming operations
- considering the possibility of “inconsistent results” in the context of the public interest factors
- considering the possibility of “inconsistent results” in the context of the public interest factors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellen Segal Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.