Skip to main content
· 8/17/2010

Pueblo v. National Indian Gaming Commission

Citations

  • 731 F. Supp. 2d 36
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84522
  • 2010 WL 3239114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the same for claims arising under the APA and NEPA
  • holding the same for claims arising under the APA and NEPA
  • granting motion to transfer given the “strong local implications” in a case involving tribal gaming operations
  • granting motion to transfer given the “strong local implications” in a case involving tribal gaming operations
  • considering the possibility of “inconsistent results” in the context of the public interest factors
  • considering the possibility of “inconsistent results” in the context of the public interest factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellen Segal Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.