Pueblo of Sandia v. Babbitt, Bruce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate court lacked jurisdiction to review district court order remanding to agency for further proceedings
• holding that appellate court lacked jurisdiction to review district court order remanding to agency for further proceedings
• holding that “[b]ecause the district court’s order [came] within the category of a remand for significant further proceedings,” the D.C. Circuit was “without jurisdiction to review it because . . . remand orders as a category are not 14 final.”
• determining that district court’s Remand Order “contemplate[d] more than the ministerial act of using a corrected survey”
• \The courts of appeals ... shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States....\
• “The courts of appeals ... shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).