Pucino v. Verizon Wireless Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that facially sex-neutral incidents, including “denial, of overtime,” could provide the basis for an inference of gender discrimination when considered in combination with sex-based “verbal attacks,” including use of the word “bitch,” ah “intensely degrading sexual epithet”
• noting that a plaintiff need not show “her hostile working environment was both severe and pervasive; only that it was sufficiently severe or sufficiently pervasive, or a sufficient combination of those elements, to have altered her working conditions”
• discussing the requirement that facially neutral events be somehow shown to be discriminatory in assessing “totality of the circumstances offered to prove a hostile work environment”
• “We review discrimination 8 claims brought under the NYSHRL according to the same standards that we apply to Title 9 VII discrimination claims.”
• “We review discrimination claims brought under the NYSHRL according to the same standards that we apply to Title YII discrimination claims.”
• \We review discrimination claims brought under the NYSHRL according to the same standards that we apply to Title VII discrimination claims.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).