Pucci v. Litwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing new allegations to relate back because they “involved the alleged inducement of investors into a fraudulent investment scheme” alleged in the original complaint
• client could maintain action against attorney for violation of consumer fraud and deceptive business practices act under Illinois law
• not all client claims against attorneys relate to provisions of legal services
• not all client claims against attorney's relate to provisions of legal services.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).