· 1/22/1976

Public Utility District No. 1 v. Kottsick

Citations

545 P.2d 1
86 Wash. 2d 388
1976 Wash. LEXIS 863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

anticipated interruption of appellants' view by proposed transmission line did not constitute taking requiring just compensation
adjacent property owners had no standing to intervene
adjacent property owners had no standing to intervene

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.