Skip to main content
· 8/10/2004

Public Utility District No. 1 Of Grays Harbor County Washington v. Idacorp Inc.

Citations

  • 379 F.3d 641
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it would be inconsistent with congressional intent to permit a state court to do, through a legal principle of general applicability, that which the federal entity in the preempted field itself may not do
  • an attempt to reform a contract might be sustainable, but damages are not available
  • it is the thrust of the complaint, not the form of the action, that governs preemption
  • identifying ways in which FERC maintained regulation of market-based rates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.