Public Service Commission v. Panda-Brandywine, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that resell agreement was an assignment in contravention of an antiassignment provision and therefore invalid and unenforceable
• relying on Restatement (Second) §§ 317-23 (1981) of Contracts that assignments are valid unless inoperative on grounds of, inter alia, public policy
• An issue that was not raised before the Commission or encompassed in the final decision of the agency should not be addressed by the appellate court on judicial review of that decision.
• An issue that was not raised before the Commission or encompassed in the final -27- decision of the agency should not be addressed by the appellate court on judicial review of that decision.
• “The basic rules [of assignments] are well-stated in the Restatement (Second
• “The basic rules [of assignments] are well-stated in the Restatement (Second

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).