Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. Bleak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \words offered as evidence of an utterance which caused a state of mind in the listener are not within the proscription of [Rule] 802\
• finding no prejudicial error where the statement \was merely cumulative to other evidence properly admitted\
• words offered for effect on listener “are not within the proscription of Ariz. R. Evid. 802, since they are not offered for a hearsay purpose”
• words offered for effect on listener “are not within the proscription of Ariz. R. Evid. 802, since they are not offered for a hearsay purpose”
• improper admission of hearsay testimony not prejudicial when “the facts thereby admitted are not controverted”
• “Impeachment by contradiction is a well-recognized practice.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).