Public Health Trust of Dade Cty. v. Valcin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, once a van- ishing presumption is rebutted, issues are resolved “as in a typical case,” and “[t]he jury is never told of the presumption”
• “Rarely, and usually only in malpractice cases, the findings [in a surgical note] are inadequately described or omitted altogether. This is a suspicious circumstance.”
• line of cases concluding that s. 768.28 , F.S. [1988 Supp.], affords immunity to physicians employed by the state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).