Skip to main content
· 9/2/1998

Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Shalala

Citations

  • 153 F.3d 1160
  • 82 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6072
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21435
  • 1998 WL 559339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing origin of authorization of state and local government employee's inclusion in Social Security system
  • identifying Defendant PERA in the caption as a “statutory agent for the State of New Mexico”
  • describing origin ofauthorization ofstate and local government employee's inclusion in Social Security system
  • “Congress did not consider the 1984 change to be dramatic, labeling the amendment a technical correction. Nonetheless, that technical correction has become very important” because it made certain retirement plan contributions subject to FICA taxes
  • “Congress did not consid- er the 1984 change to be dramatic, labeling the amendment a technical correction. Nonetheless, that technical correction has become very im- portant” because it made certain retirement plan contributions subject to FICA taxes.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Brorby, Briscoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.