· 9/2/1998
Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Shalala
Citations
- 153 F.3d 1160
- 82 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6072
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21435
- 1998 WL 559339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing origin of authorization of state and local government employee's inclusion in Social Security system
- identifying Defendant PERA in the caption as a “statutory agent for the State of New Mexico”
- describing origin ofauthorization ofstate and local government employee's inclusion in Social Security system
- “Congress did not consider the 1984 change to be dramatic, labeling the amendment a technical correction. Nonetheless, that technical correction has become very important” because it made certain retirement plan contributions subject to FICA taxes
- “Congress did not consid- er the 1984 change to be dramatic, labeling the amendment a technical correction. Nonetheless, that technical correction has become very im- portant” because it made certain retirement plan contributions subject to FICA taxes.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, Brorby, Briscoe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.