Public Citizen, Inc., Aviation Consumer Action Project, and Families of Pan-Am 103/lockerbie v. Federal Aviation Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that if the court can “reasonábly discern [ ]” the agency’s path, it will uphold the agency’s decision
• holding that the APA applies to review of FAA orders
• stating that agencies must adequately explain the results of rulemaking
• stating that agencies must adequately explain the results of rulemaking
• stating, without analysis, that Congress committed the Airline Security Improvement Act of 1990 to the FAA’s administration
• applying APA standard to review the FAA's nonfactual matters where the statute provided that findings of fact were reviewed under the \substantial evidence\ standard, but was \silen[t] as to the standard for reviewing nonfactual matters\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).