Public Citizen Health Research Group v. National Institutes of Health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider letters from third parties “submitted by Defendant . . . [d]ue to hearsay concerns”
• refusing to rely on third-party letters in Exemption 4 case “due to hearsay concerns”
• “The Court highly disfavors parties creating new arguments at the reply stage that were not fully briefed during the litigation.”
• \The evidence of those who did respond was overwhelmingly against disclosure which tips the scales heavily toward a conclusion that release of the information would likely cause substantial competitive injury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).