· 3/5/2010
Public Advocate v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N
Citations
- 779 N.W.2d 328
- 279 Neb. 543
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that although res judicata requires preclusive effect for issues that could have been raised, the rule applies to questions “relevant to and falling within the purview of the original action[.]” (emphasis added)
- noting that although res judicata requires preclu-sive effect for issues that could have been raised, the rule applies to questions “relevant to and falling within the purview of the original action[.]” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heavican
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.