PT Indopac Perdana Finance v. Masagung

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a claim for breach of express warranty where plaintiff had not pled sufficient facts to show that defendant had warranted what plaintiff claimed it did
• “Here, Plaintiff . . . has provided no factual basis for inferring she was injured by Defendant’s alleged deceptive advertising by not experiencing the four hours of ‘nutritious steady energy’ promised on the Product’s packaging.”
• “[T]he question of whether a plaintiff has standing to bring suit, and thus whether the court has jurisdiction to 3Counts II to VI require a plaintiff to allege actual damages. Kurowski v. Rush Sys. for Health, 659 F. Supp. 3d 931, 942 (N.D. Ill. 2023)(ICFA
• dismissing express warranty claim after dismissing ICFA claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).