Skip to main content
· 5/17/2002

PT Indonesia Epson Industry v. Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.

Citations

  • 219 F. Supp. 2d 1265
  • 2002 A.M.C. 2769
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21883
  • 2002 WL 31007781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following King Ocean’s analysis and determining that “the Carmack Amendment does not necessarily apply to the through bill of lading issued by [the ocean carrier]”
  • following King Ocean’s analysis and deter- mining that “the Carmack Amendment does not necessarily apply to the through bill of lading issued by [the ocean carri- er]”
  • following King Ocean’s analysis and deter- mining that “the Carmack Amendment does not necessarily apply to the through bill of lading issued by [the ocean carri- er]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.