· 5/17/2002
PT Indonesia Epson Industry v. Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.
Citations
- 219 F. Supp. 2d 1265
- 2002 A.M.C. 2769
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21883
- 2002 WL 31007781
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- following King Ocean’s analysis and determining that “the Carmack Amendment does not necessarily apply to the through bill of lading issued by [the ocean carrier]”
- following King Ocean’s analysis and deter- mining that “the Carmack Amendment does not necessarily apply to the through bill of lading issued by [the ocean carri- er]”
- following King Ocean’s analysis and deter- mining that “the Carmack Amendment does not necessarily apply to the through bill of lading issued by [the ocean carri- er]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jordan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.